JCPSLP Vol 21 No 2 2019 DIGITAL Edition
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for parents (n = 12)
Relationship with child
Age
Parental education
Ancestral background
LOTE*
Mother
26–30 years
Diploma/certificate
Australian
Auslan
Mother
20–25 years
Diploma/certificate
Australian
Mother
26–30 years
Diploma/certificate
Australian
Auslan
Mother
>40 years
University degree
European
Italian
Mother
>40 years
University degree
Asian/Australian
NS
Mother
26–30 years
Diploma/certificate
Australian
Mother
31–35 years
High school certificate
Australian
Arabic
Mother
26–30 years
University degree
Australian
Auslan
Mother
36–40 years
University degree
Australian
Mother
31–35 years
University degree
Asian/Australian
Father
36–40 years
University degree
Asian
Mother
31–35 years
University degree
NR
Tamil
*LOTE: language other than English; NR: no response; NS: not specified
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for children (n = 12)
severity
Auditory intervention
Additional disability
Child age
LOTE*
HL u
< 3 months
Auslan
Profound
7–9 months
Profound
Bilateral CI^
10–12 months
Auslan
Severe
Bilateral HA^^
10–12 months
Italian
Profound
Bilateral CI
10–12 months
NS
Profound
Awaiting CI
1–2 years
Moderate
Bilateral HA
2–3 years
Arabic
Severe
Unilateral CI
2–3 years
Auslan
Moderate
Bilateral HA
Trisomy 21
2–3 years
Mild
Bilateral HA
2–3 years
Moderate
Mini bone conductor
Diastrophic dysplasia
2–3 years
Tamil
Moderate
Bilateral HA
2–3 years
Profound
Bilateral CI
*LOTE: language other than English; NS: not specified; u HL: hearing loss; ^CI: cochlear implant/s; ^^HA: hearing aid/s
Procedure The study was approved by three Human Research Ethics committees (University of Canterbury Human Research Ethics: 2013/56/ERHEC; Griffith University: RHS/51/13/ HREC; Children’s Health Services Queensland: HREC/14/ QRCH/42). Recruitment was conducted through The Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre/Royal Institute of Deaf and Blind Children (SCIC/RIDBC). Advertisements and flyers were advertised at reception areas and clinic rooms at SCIC/RIDBC and were offered to potential participants by staff members (such as audiologists and speech pathologists). The advertisements and flyers contained a brief description about the study, a link to the online version
of the questionnaire, and the first author’s contact details. Hard copies of the questionnaire with reply paid envelopes were available. Participants received an information sheet prior to commencing the questionnaire outlining that participation was voluntary and anonymous. Consent was obtained through the first question on the questionnaire. As recruitment was conducted at multiple locations by multiple clinicians it is unknown how many parents were invited to participate. Participants were able to skip questions and data was missing in instances where parents preferred not to answer. If parents had not commenced ESR with their child the questionnaire directed them to the next relevant section.
80
JCPSLP Volume 21, Number 2 2019
Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology
Made with FlippingBook HTML5