JCPSLP Vol 19 No 2 2017
9-months post-commencement point was 1.5 (SD = 0.9; Range = 1–3). At this time point, 80% of the children were reported to have an SR = 2 or less. The repeated measures GEE analyses for the assessment time effect indicated for both %SS (Wald X 2 (2) = 95.410, p < 0.001) and SR (Wald X 2 (2) = 175.251, p < 0.001) that there was a statistically significant effect over the three assessment times. The time-specific comparisons indicated a significant reduction in stuttering with a large effect size between the baseline scores at the initial assessment (T1) and the 6-months post-commencement assessment (T2) for both %SS (Wald X 2 (1) = 56.71, p < 0.001, effect size 1.71) and SR (Wald X 2 (1) = 88.69, p < 0.001, effect size 2.26). Subsequently, there was only a non-significant change, with a negligible effect size, between the 6-months post-commencement (T2) and 9-months post commencement assessment (T3) for both %SS ( X 2 (1) = 0.655, p = 0.42, effect size 0.23) ) and SR ( X 2 (1) = 0.48, p = 0.49, effect size 0.23) (see Table 3).
12
1
8
6
Mean %SS Figure 1. Mean clinician percentage syllable stuttered (%SS) at initial assessment (n = 19), 6 months (n = 14) and 9 months (n = 10) post-commencement of group treatment 4 2 0 Initial assessment 6 months post- commencement 9 months post commencement
Table 3. Intention to treat analysis using generalised estimating equation method
comparing clinician percentage syllables stuttered (%SS) and parent–clinician agreed severity rating (SR) initial assessment (T1), 6 months (T2) and 9 months (T3) post-commencement
8
7
N
df
p
Effect size
Wald X 2
6
5
%SS 19, 14, 10 T1 vs T2 56.707 1 <.001 1.71
T2 vs T3 .655
1 .418 .23
4
The %SS scores were comparable to the parent–clinician agreed severity ratings (SR) taken within clinic at the same points. The SR scale from 1 = no stutter to 10 = extremely severe stuttering was used. A guideline update (Packman et al., 2015) has subsequently changed the scale from 0 to 9. The mean SR for all the children assessed at the Mean SR Figure 2. Mean parent–clinician severity rating (SR) at initial assessment (n = 19), 6 months (n = 14) and 9 months (n = 10) post-commencement of group treatment 3 2 1 0 Initial assessment 6 months post- commencement 9 months post commencement
SR 19, 14, 10 T1 vs T2 88.692 1 <.001 2.26
T2 vs T3 .479
1 .489 .27
Discussion This clinician-led trial is the first to investigate the short-term treatment outcomes of the LP rolling-group model in community settings. Across all measures, the community- based SLPs achieved clinical outcomes similar to those benchmarks published in the literature: mean clinician hours to completion of Stage 1 (Arnott et al., 2014), median number of clinical visits and weeks to attain Stage 2 (Arnott et al., 2014; O’Brian et al., 2013; Rousseau, Packman, Onslow, Harrison, & Jones, 2007) and percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) at criteria for Stage 2 (Arnott et al., 2014; de Sonneville-Koedoot et al., 2015; Jones et al., 2005). Stuttering severity levels exhibited a statistically significant reduction between pre-treatment and 6-months
Table 2. Clinician percent syllables stuttered (%SS) and parent–clinician agreed severity rating (SR) at initial assessment, 6 and 9 months post-commencement assessment
Severity measure Assessment
n
Mean
SD
Min
Max
%SS
Initial assessment
19
7.4
3.9
2.6
17.0
6 months post-commencement
14
1.4
1.7
0
5.0
9 months post-commencement
10
1.3
2.1
0
5.3
SR
Initial assessment
19
5.3
1.6
3
8
6 months post-commencement
14
1.6
1.0
1
4
9 months post-commencement
10
1.5
.9
1
3
79
JCPSLP Volume 19, Number 2 2017
www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au
Made with FlippingBook