JCPSLP July 2014_Vol16_no2
Patient Education – Informal Patient Education – Formal (SP specific) Patient Education – Formal (general BI) Family Education – Informal Family Education – Formal (SP specific) Family Education – Formal (general BI)
Education/Support to other SPs (BI/pt management) Advocacy for pts with severe communication impairment Community/transition services Workplace/CRS School/TAFE/Study Adult Guardian
Activity Type Figure 1. Education, Advocacy & Liaison No Yes – if required Yes – regular service
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % BIRU SP services
BI = brain injury; Pt = patient; CRS = Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service
Table 1. Identified service gaps in SLP BIRU services
Table 2. Utilisation of additional SLP services in BIRU
Work practice Service delivery
BIRU SLPs
Suggested activities
Work practice
BIRU SLPs
Suggested activities
37.5% Increased staffing for increased service provision
Patient therapy services
87.5% Increased interventions/intensity/ daily therapy More groups Trials of new therapies
Provide therapy in patient’s home with significant others/children Home visits Facilitation of transition home Liaison with employer or school Follow up services post discharge
Review/change service delivery
50% Home visits
Facilitating transitions Practising skills in home environment with children Better access to families for therapy
37.5% Social network training Social skills training
Therapy services/ interventions
Resource development
25% Not specified
Increased community based interventions Increased functional activities
Research
25% Not specified
Increased links with the MDT/IDT to facilitate incorporating SLP goals into team sessions/groups
Projects/quality activities
25% Not specified
Education
25% Clients/families/carers
Family based services
25% Increased interventions with families/ children Better access to families
Improve staff support
25% Supervision Education
Education
25% To staff
Acute and regional staff
To families Support SLP colleagues (acute, rural) in managing patients with ABI
Completion of non-clinical tasks
12.5% Not specified
12.5% Nil
Additional staffing not required
No response to question No service gaps identified
12.5% Nil
50% Nil
updates and progress reports, setting goals, discussing goal attainment, rehabilitation planning and discharge planning. Service gaps and enhancement BIRU SLPs were asked to identify any “gaps in their current service” and/or “ideas for service enhancement / novel services”, with responses via free text. Four BIRU SLP
IDT = interdisciplinary team; MDT = multidisciplinary team
In addition, all BIRU SLPs (100%, n = 8) reported they were involved in family meetings as a standard part of BIRU services, which included providing information/education, discussing behaviour management, providing rehabilitation
53
JCPSLP Volume 16, Number 2 2014
www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au
Made with FlippingBook